버나드 윌리암스(Bernard Williams)는 Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy 란 책에서 다음과 같이 말 합니다.
What distinguishes analytical philosophy from other contemporary philosophy (though not from much philosophy of other times) is a certain way of going on, which involves argument, distinctions, and, so far as it remembers to try to achieve it and succeeds, moderately plain speech. As an alternative to plain speech, it distinguishes sharply between obscurity and technicality. It always rejects the first, but the second it sometimes finds a necessity. This feature peculiarly enlarges some of its enemies. Wanting philosophy to be at once profound and accessible, they resent technicality but are comforted by obscurity.
What distinguishes analytical philosophy from other contemporary philosophy (though not from much philosophy of other times) is a certain way of going on, which involves argument, distinctions, and, so far as it remembers to try to achieve it and succeeds, moderately plain speech. As an alternative to plain speech, it distinguishes sharply between obscurity and technicality. It always rejects the first, but the second it sometimes finds a necessity. This feature peculiarly enlarges some of its enemies. Wanting philosophy to be at once profound and accessible, they resent technicality but are comforted by obscurity.
'철학이야기' 카테고리의 다른 글
| Defense of Rationality? (0) | 2011.08.26 |
|---|---|
| 다윈의 진화론에 대한 두 가지 평가 (0) | 2011.08.26 |
| Bryan Magee's Old TV Interviews with Philosophers (0) | 2011.05.29 |
| The lifecycle of the academic philosopher (0) | 2011.04.25 |
| 교하도서관: 영상의 인문학 강좌 (0) | 2011.04.15 |
